What he said was that for Senate to claim to have a rejected a
nominee sent to us by the president,
we have to follow the right
procedure, and observe our rules, the senator said.
“The nominee
should have been called into the chamber and presented before senators
who will then openly vote on whether to accept or reject his or her
nomination.
“In the case of Magu, that was not done. We only had a closed-door session and when we emerged
the Senate spokesperson claimed that he had been rejected. I had to set
the record straight by saying we never rejected the nominee. This is
because you don’t accept or reject a nominee at a closed session.
Öur votes and proceedings are there as evidence of my claims.”
Mr. Ndume said the clarification he made unsettled some of his colleagues, who immediately began to plot against him.
“Ï was surprised that such a simple and harmless clarification could
rattle and anger some of my colleagues,” he said. I thought it wasn’t a
big deal to disagree over issues. I didn’t realise that that simple
matter would snowball into a plot to remove me.
“The other day,
somebody mentioned to me that the Senate President had commissioned Dino
Melaye to collect signatures to remove me. I didn’t pay much attention
to the information because I actually thought it was a joke or a rumour.
“I didn’t feel that disagreeing with colleagues, and sharing my
understanding of what transpired at our closed session was an offence,
grievous enough to cause my removal.”
No comments:
Post a Comment